ldoherty

Northeast-based property and casualty (P&C) insurance holding firm Kingstone Companies has announced the finalization of its catastrophe reinsurance program for the period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025.

Jennifer Gravelle (pictured above, left), chief financial officer at Kingstone, highlighted the placement and how it compared to the previous treaty period.

“Kingstone has finalized its 2024/2025 catastrophe reinsurance placement. The company purchased $275 million of total catastrophe limit and reduced its first event retention to $5 million. The total cost is approximately 14% of projected direct premiums earned, a significant reduction from 19% for the previous treaty period,” Gravelle said.

In a news release, Gravelle highlighted that last year, the company tightened underwriting and curtailed new business writings to better manage catastrophe exposure and reduce probable maximum loss (PML). Although reinsurance pricing increased, it was not as significant as projected.

As a result, Kingstone was able to lower its 2024/2025 reinsurance treaty cost by about $6 million, improving projected full-year earnings by approximately $0.21 per share and providing better protection with a lower first event retention. These savings will be reflected in the third and fourth quarter results of 2024.

Meryl Golden (pictured above, right), chief executive officer of Kingstone, thanked the reinsurance support from the firm’s more than 25 partners.

“In 2024, with expectations of the reinsurance market softening and confidence in our rates, we re-adjusted our underwriting guidelines to accept more new business. This has resulted in more than 20% premium growth in our core New York State business, which continues to accelerate, while we were also able to significantly reduce the cost of this year’s reinsurance placement,” Golden said.

Kingstone is a Northeast regional P&C insurance holding company with its principal operating subsidiary, Kingstone Insurance Company (KICO). KICO, a New York domiciled carrier, writes business through retail and wholesale agents and brokers.

KICO actively writes personal lines and commercial auto insurance in New York, and in 2023, was the 15th largest writer of homeowners insurance in New York. KICO is also licensed in New Jersey, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, and Maine.

What are your thoughts on this story? Please feel free to share your comments below.

Ariel Re, a global reinsurance firm with offices in Bermuda, London, and Hong Kong, has introduced a new group of summer interns at its Bermuda location.

The four Bermudian students will gain insights into the operations of a reinsurance company and expand their industry knowledge.

The students include Gaby Furr from Queen’s University, studying political science and economics; Heston Kessell from the University of Guelph, studying economics; Moriah Wheddon, an accounting student at Bermuda College; and Matthew Brookes from the University of Kent, studying finance and investment.

In its fourth year, the internship program offers exposure to various roles within the reinsurance sector, including underwriting, claims, catastrophe modeling, and actuarial science.

The interns will work in different departments, engage in multiple projects, and attend daily meetings.

“We look forward to the fourth cohort of internship students joining us at Ariel Re this year, and to another year of developing reinsurance talent,” Ariel Re head of human resource Lindsay Hyland said.

Hyland added that the new group of interns underscores Ariel Re’s commitment to fostering career and knowledge growth in reinsurance, expressing hope that some may pursue permanent roles within the company.

Ariel Re provides a range of insurance and reinsurance solutions through its offices in Bermuda, London, and Hong Kong, serving a diverse client base. Operating through Syndicate 1910 at Lloyd’s of London, Ariel Re also offers access to Lloyd’s Europe.

Back in April, Ariel Re and Hiscox Re & ILS have announced the formation of CyberShock, a cyber catastrophe consortium.

CyberShock is also designed to ensure better certainty of coverage for significant cyber incidents, including service and hardware supply chain events, cyber propagation events, software supply chain disruptions, and catalytic cyber events.

“Against a backdrop of both a lack of clarity around cyber event definitions and meaningful capacity in the cyber reinsurance marketplace, we believe the CyberShock consortium can act as a positive catalyst for the market,” Hiscox Re & ILS chief underwriting officer Matthew Wilken said.

What are your thoughts on this story? Please feel free to share your comments below.

KPMG is letting people go in the UK after recently announcing the British unit’s merger with KPMG Switzerland.

On May 24, KPMG UK and KPMG Switzerland confirmed their planned combination, noting that the resulting entity will be the second biggest KPMG operations within the group’s global network.

UK chief executive and senior partner Jon Holt described the move as a “historic moment” for the two KPMG partnerships.

“We will be stronger as one combined firm and together we will have the scale to significantly enhance our ability to deliver great outcomes for our clients both internationally and within our domestic markets,” Holt commented less than a month ago.

“Merging brings huge benefits for our clients, our people, and our partnership and means we can now grow faster, be more profitable and invest together to create new services in a sustainable way.”

Now, according to Financial Times sources, UK colleagues were notified on Thursday about a retrenchment set to impact around 200 employees in back-office and client-facing positions.

The plan, according to the report, is to reduce duplication by combining certain functions. KPMG UK, which is manned by over 17,000 people, already said goodbye to more than 200 staff at the end of 2023.

According to an FT source, the consultation process on the proposed redundancies would be finalised by the beginning of October.

What do you think about this story? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

^{Image credit: Photo released by Sian Hammond’s family via Cambridgeshire Constabulary}

Cambridge Crown Court has been told that the man accused of killing his wife in Histon had paid her life insurance less than a week before she was found dead last October 30.

According to Christopher Paxton KC of the prosecution side, 47-year-old mortgage broker Robert Hammond made Sian Hammond’s (pictured) Legal & General policy up to date by paying in late October 2023.

No more than five days later, Robert made a 999 call to say Sian was not breathing – the 46-year-old was pronounced dead in their Cambridgeshire home.

Citing the findings of a post-mortem examination, the prosecutor told the court that Sian had been strangled. It was also established that she suffered other injuries, while Robert claimed he had found the mother of his two teenage children face down on the bed.

It was highlighted that at the time of Sian’s death, Robert was under extreme financial pressure due to what Paxton called “a surging mountain of debt” worth around £300,000. His wife’s life insurance policy would have paid out £450,000.

What do you think about this story? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Global insurance intermediary group Howden has chosen Paul Hipson (pictured) to take on the newly established role of London broking head for the corporate & commercial division within Howden UK & Ireland.

As head, Hipson will oversee the London broking team, which primarily assists Howden UK&I in placing property, casualty, and motor business into the market.

The new role is integral to the company’s strategic growth initiatives, and Hipson will focus on expanding broking operations nationally, fostering relationships with insurer partners, and enhancing support for colleagues to better serve clients.

The London broking remit adds to Hipson’s current duties leading the London corporate existing business team, reflected in his updated title of head of London corporate and broking.

Hipson, whose credentials span nearly 21 years with Howden (including Aston Lark and its predecessor firms), will report to chief placement officer for corporate & commercial Paul Hasib. Prior to his widened function, Hipson led the London corporate existing business team through significant development.

“I’m really excited about this new role and passionate about broking, so I’m looking forward to working more closely with our insurer partners and colleagues to help grow and enhance our broking proposition, focussed always on delivering the best service and solutions for our clients,” he commented.

“There is a talented group of individuals within the existing broking and placement teams who do a fantastic job, and we’ll be building on these strong foundations as we continue this exciting growth journey.”

Meanwhile Hasib remarked: “Paul has a proven track record of achieving great client and management results. This role is perfect for moving those outcomes to the next level.”

Headquartered in the UK, Howden operates in 55 countries and employs 17,000 people. The global business handles £30 billion of premium on behalf of clients.

What do you think about this story? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Following the UK’s announcement of around 50 new sanctions against Vladimir Putin’s “war machine” last week, Russian insurer Ingosstrakh Insurance Company is looking at the pathways it can take, including possible legal action, to contest its inclusion.

When the sanctions were unveiled, the UK government noted: “New targets include ships in Putin’s shadow fleet, institutions at the heart of Russia’s financial system, and suppliers supporting Russia’s military production. 

“These new sanctions, announced while the Prime Minister attends the G7 Leaders Summit in Italy, will bear down on Russia’s ability to fund and equip its war machine and show the UK’s steadfast support for Ukraine.”

Among those sanctioned are suppliers of munitions, machine tools, microelectronics, logistics, or other supplies; entities connected to Russia’s financial system; and groups that operate in or support the Russian liquefied natural gas and civil nuclear sectors.

Ingosstrakh, whose offerings include marine insurance, is the only insurer on the new list. A Bloomberg report highlighted: “Sanctions against Ingosstrakh are notable because it is a major provider of coverage for the commercial fleet moving Russian oil, largely displacing insurers based in the UK and Europe.”

Now Ingosstrakh is said to be working on getting the sanctions lifted.

In an emailed statement to Reuters, the insurer said: “The reasons pertaining to the OFSI (Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation) sanctions upon Ingosstrakh remain unclear to us since Ingosstrakh operates in strict compliance with all applicable legislation and follows all due compliance procedures.

To date, under its Russia sanctions regime, the UK has sanctioned more than 2,000 individuals and entities. Based on 2021 figures, over £20 billion of UK-Russia bilateral trade is now under full or partial sanction.

What do you think about this story? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Munich Re has released its Climate Risk Preparedness Survey 2023/24, underscoring significant concerns about climate change and its impact on weather-related disasters.

The survey, conducted globally, reveals varying levels of preparedness and perception regarding climate risks among companies, the public, and authorities.

The year 2023 marked the hottest year on record, with extreme temperatures contributing to severe weather events. In both the US and Europe, losses from thunderstorms reached unprecedented levels. Against this backdrop, Munich Re sought to gauge whether different sectors feel prepared for these escalating climate risks.

The survey indicates high levels of concern about climate change, though there is a noticeable gap between concern and willingness to invest in preventive measures. Respondents affected by past weather disasters expressed heightened concern and a greater readiness to invest in loss prevention.

Munich Re notes that these findings highlight areas where additional investment in preventive measures and integration of insurance mechanisms into comprehensive risk management strategies may be needed.

How prepared are businesses to tackle climate risks?

A significant majority (80%) of respondents expressed concern or great concern about the impact of climate change. Conversely, about 20% reported being either not particularly worried or had not considered it.

Regional differences are notable. In emerging economies such as South Africa, Brazil, and India, concern about climate risks is higher compared to developed economies like Japan, Germany, and China. This discrepancy may be due to the higher preparedness and financial resilience of stronger economies.

European countries, generally less exposed to extreme natural disasters, exhibit lower levels of concern. However, 2023 saw record damage from severe thunderstorms in both the US and Europe, often accompanied by tornadoes and hail.

In Japan, despite the country’s vulnerability to natural disasters, strict building regulations and a focus on earthquake risks may contribute to lower expressed concerns about climate change. Japanese respondents tend to prioritize earthquake prevention and risk awareness over weather-related disasters.

Respondents’ concerns about the negative impact of climate change on their companies mirrored their overall concerns. Senior managers (C-level) exhibited more serious worries compared to lower-level employees.

Additionally, concern about climate change’s impact on companies has increased over the past decade, particularly among managerial roles and respondents in emerging countries.

The survey’s findings indicate that pure property damage is not the primary concern for any group or region. Instead, business interruption and loss of revenue are seen as the most serious risks. For top managers, supply chain interruptions also emerge as a significant risk, leading to revenue loss and business disruption.

What are your thoughts on this story? Please feel free to share your comments below.

Global reinsurer Swiss Re has indicated that the insurance industry has significantly underestimated the impact of recent natural disasters in Europe and has raised concerns about some regions becoming uninsurable.

Gianfranco Lot, the group’s chief underwriting officer for property and casualty reinsurance, noted that models were substantially off in predicting the damage from events like the Turkey earthquake, the floods in Germany, and the hailstorms in Italy.

“Whether it’s the Turkey quake… or the floods in Germany or the hailstorms in Italy, models were off by factors as opposed to 10 or 20%,” Lot said to the Financial Times.

In 2023, global insured losses from natural catastrophes surpassed $100 billion for the fourth consecutive year, with $6.2 billion attributed to the Turkey earthquake.

Lot emphasized Swiss Re’s significant investment in improving its natural catastrophe models by incorporating more data. This effort aims to enhance the accuracy of predictions regarding the impact of such events.

Swiss Re identified the underestimation of extreme weather event costs as an industry-wide issue, stemming from inadequate data on current exposure and risk values. The increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, driven by global warming, have escalated costs for the insurance and reinsurance sectors.

Homeowners worldwide are facing higher insurance premiums or struggling to obtain coverage, prompting discussions on the extent of government intervention needed to mitigate climate change costs for consumers. Lot stated that government intervention is necessary and beneficial in high-risk areas that have become uninsurable.

In the United States, the debate over disaster repair costs has been particularly contentious. Some home insurers have withdrawn from high-risk areas, such as parts of California. US home insurers often require local regulatory approval for pricing changes, leading to industry accusations that they cannot keep up with rising claims costs.

A senior executive from the American Property Casualty Insurance Association, Robert Gordon, also noted that government interference has led some US insurers to limit coverage in states frequently affected by natural disasters. Gordon asserted that efforts to prevent steep increases in home insurance costs have critically injured parts of the insurance market.

“That’s where you’re seeing in the US, the markets where you’re having a real availability crisis, it’s because the government is trying to suppress those [premiums],” Gordon said.

What are your thoughts on this story? Please feel free to share your comments below.

The advent of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) presents boundless opportunities and new exposures for the global media, film, TV, and entertainment industry.

At least one insurance leader is calling on the industry to adapt its approach to risks posed by the new technology.

Ros Breese (pictured), underwriting director – media, film & TV at Tokio Marine HCC International, said the rapid development of Gen AI has sparked intense discussions within the media insurance industry.

The technology presents a novel set of risks that diverge significantly from traditional content creation methods, spurring concerns about “how and when it’s okay for our clients to be using generative AI to create content, and how insurers can manage and assess that risk,” Breese told Insurance Business.

She said the unique nature of these risks, coupled with the rapidly evolving landscape, has led to a cautious approach to AI and generative AI among media and film companies.

Media, film and entertainment firms exposed

The industry’s cautious stance also comes amid notable legal cases, such as an ongoing New York Times lawsuit against ChatGPT owner Open AI over the use of archival material in generative AI tools.

The US news organization has claimed its copyright was infringed to train models. The lawsuit, which also names Microsoft as a defendant, says the companies must be accountable for billions in damages.

“There’s a nervousness in the media industry about when it’s okay to use AI, whether as a research tool or for content that might be released later,” Breese said. “Everyone has a different take on it. There’s uncertainty about what’s acceptable, especially from an insurance perspective. Will insurers cover claims for content created with generative AI?”

The immense challenge of tracing original content ownership in gen AI material leaves companies vulnerable to IP claims. As generative AI becomes more widely used, the insurance industry will need to adapt its approach to the risks it poses, argued Breese.

“All content is owned by somebody,” she said. “In traditional TV production, there are criteria for clearing rights from writers and third-party content providers. That’s not possible with generative AI.”

Risk management for gen AI risks should involve developing protocols to trace content origins and establishing a chain of responsibility between clients and generative AI tools. Legislative clarity and landmark cases such as the New York Times lawsuit will also play pivotal roles in shaping future insurance strategies.

“I think we’ll probably end up viewing it the same way as other content and working with insurers to mitigate claims. This means recognizing what generative AI is used for and ensuring we can track the original content owner, creating a chain of responsibility between them and the AI tool,” she said.  “We’re on a journey.”

Beyond fiction content – how has the media landscape changed since COVID-19?

The highly dynamic risk landscape in media has recently prompted Tokio Marine HCC to launch a global media division dedicated to underwriting risks in the media, film, television, and events sectors.

Breese, who has been tapped to lead the division, joined TMHCC in 2018. She has over 25 years of experience in the industry and has held senior roles at Beazley, Hiscox and Markel.

Beyond the technological challenges, the media consumption landscape itself is shifting, influenced heavily by the pandemic. There’s a marked trend away from traditional production content towards shorter, more digestible formats like podcasts, said Breese.

“As insurers, we’re seeing a lot more podcast material than ever before, particularly in the true crime genre. There’s a significant interest in documentaries using archival footage, as opposed to big-budget dramas,” she observed.

“If you look at streaming services now, there’s a vast portfolio of documentaries available, something we wouldn’t have seen five or ten years ago. We’re seeing a clear trend away from fictional drama towards factual content.”

This trend necessitates a different approach to risk management. Documentary makers, for instance, face unique challenges in securing permissions from individuals appearing in their work and clearing archival footage.

“For a documentary maker, the key is to make sure that they’re getting permission from everybody that’s appearing in that documentary, which can be a bit of a minefield in itself,” Breese said.

The complexity of clearing archival footage and the use of defenses like fair use and fair dealing further complicate the production process. These challenges, Breese said, highlight the need for specialized insurance solutions tailored to the nuances of documentary and factual content production.

Breese advised brokers working with clients in media and film to stay abreast of evolving risks and their clients’ distinct coverage and risk management needs.

“The more open the relationship and the conversation for all parties in the insurance chain the more it helps,” she said.

Do you have something to say about the risks posed by the use of generative AI in the media, film and entertainment industry? Please leave a comment below.