Skip to main content
All Posts By

ldoherty

IQUW enters crisis management market

“The launch of crisis management enables IQUW to offer a greater range of specialty products,” said IQUW group chief underwriting officer David Morris.

Experienced specialty underwriter Jon Atkinson (pictured) will lead the new, multi-line, diverse portfolio’s development. He joined IQUW from Talbot Underwriting Ltd, where he was a senior class underwriter developing the reinsurer’s crisis management capabilities.

Commenting on his role in IQUW’s new portfolio, Atkinson said: “I am delighted to join IQUW and launch the new crisis management product. We will offer cover globally, with a specific focus on food & beverage, automotive, and other safety-focused manufacturing markets where we intend to be a lead market for brokers.

“IQUW has a vision for digital underwriting and, in line with this, our crisis management portfolio will combine data, automation, and human expertise to deliver consistent, accurate, and fast responses to support broker.”

Commenting on the new hire, Morris said: “Jon joins IQUW with unrivalled specialist experience, and I am thrilled that he will lead this new portfolio and develop it alongside our digital vision.”

IQUW CEO Peter Bilsby added: “We are building out a fantastic team of professionals to lead the development of our multi-line, diverse product offering.”

The launch of the crisis management offering is part of IQUW’s growth and development strategy for its specialty lines. It follows the launch of a new aviation portfolio at the end of 2021.

Source

Insurance Premium Tax – why insurers and brokers would be “wise to prepare”

Speaking with Insurance Business, Russell Brown (pictured), senior IPT consulting manager at Sovos, highlighted that changes in IPT tend to be infrequent, particularly in contract to VAT which has seen rates rise and fall several times in recent news.

“IPT was last changed in the UK in 2017, raising the standard rate from 10% to 12%,” he said. “Between 2015 and 2017, the rate jumped from 6% to 12% – but this did not generate the amount of tax revenue that the government had hoped for. Non-admitted, non-EEA insurers are mainly to blame for this, as they did not always pay the tax. Policyholders can only be assessed by HMRC in rare cases for unpaid tax.”

Read more: Insurance Premium Tax absent from Spring Statement

However, Brown noted that the UK’s exit from the EU opens the door to IPT rates being revised or eradicated altogether by the May 2024 general election. The UK’s landscape has become more tumultuous since having left the EU, and so it is possible that Brexit could lead to the government applying a standard rate of 20% VAT, rather than the current 12% IPT, to many taxable non-life insurance policies.

“A change from IPT to VAT could mean the policyholders would be liable for any tax owed if non-compliant insurers fail to meet obligations,” Brown said. “In contrast, a tax increase of 8% would be unpopular with many voters and could be perceived as a stealth tax that has been paid for through higher insurance premiums.

“Another option is to keep the current 12% IPT rate on compulsory insurance for private individuals, such as motor and home insurance. This strategy would still permit the government to charge 20% on other forms of insurance that have no social impact, such as directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. VAT registered businesses would likely be able to recover input VAT on the premiums they pay, but this isn’t the case with IPT, as it is an irrecoverable cost borne by the consumer.”

That the UK is currently carrying out a consultation on changing IPT, and potentially incorporating it into VAT, has caused a lot of conversation across the market. Despite the consultation, however, Brown said there has been little mention from governing bodies about any upcoming changes to IPT. So, although this may be on the cards for the UK, it’s clear that it is not a priority at the moment with everything else going on in the world.

In the event that changes were made to IPT, Brown noted that the insurance industry would face an increased administrative burden. At present, he said, insurers rely primarily on brokers to ensure that premium taxes and parafiscal charges such as Fire Brigade Charges are calculated properly on policies. Any administrative changes would therefore need broker approval prior to implementation.

In addition to the IPT rates, he added, the entire reporting process is also potentially subject to change. An annual IPT return, for example, may take the place of quarterly returns, with quarterly payments on account for insurers who pay more than a certain amount of IPT each year, as well as modifications to the information reported on returns. In other words, underwriters would have to spend a lot more time complying with reporting obligations.

“What’s more is that changes to IPT will have an impact on any insurance options available in the EU, such as travel insurance,” he said. “Following Brexit, brokers have been much more careful in order to remain fully compliant in both jurisdictions. They’ve had to divide up policies and give them over to other European firms in certain situations, which means they can’t provide the same level of service as they could before leaving the EU.”

As such, a charge would eventually be passed on to end-users, Brown said, and in the current high inflationary climate insurance firms should think about the social implications resulting from this.

“Life and long-term insurance products, such as income protection and five-year permanent health insurance, which are deemed lifestyle choices and are exempt from IPT, may become subject to VAT,” he said. “To avoid discouraging customers from purchasing such cover, a lower rate of 12% may be charged.”

However, Brown emphasised that, as a result of these possible developments, insurers will rely on brokers to determine whether their customer is a company that is registered for VAT in the UK or a private individual. Therefore, brokers will need to be significantly involved in these negotiations, as they are responsible for ensuring correct taxation and keeping records, which they then pass on to insurers.

“One critical piece of information that brokers should retain and pass on is the policyholder’s VAT registration number,” he advised, “so that it is included in the policy documentation sent to them, in case any issues arise with HMRC.”

Read next: Insurance Premium Tax – why is the time right to make changes?

Looking to the future, Brown highlighted that while IPT is certainly an area in need of modernisation, it’s not part of the UK government’s plans under the Making Tax Digital scheme. The last consultation did raise the question of whether IPT needed modernisation, he said, but these initiatives weren’t welcomed by respondents.

“HMT and HMRC currently have more urgent matters to handle,” he said, “but they plan to continue consulting with interested parties, such as insurers’ representative bodies (the Association of British Insurers, the International Underwriting Association), brokers’ representative bodies (the London and International Insurance Brokers Association), and others, regarding this change.

“With the last consultation officially closed in February 2021, the results weren’t published until November 2021 – therefore it’s clear that this isn’t a current priority for HMRC. In the next phase, HMRC will conduct another consultation and organise regular meetings with Industry Liaison Group members. Although the process will take time, insurers and brokers in the UK would be wise to prepare for change in the years ahead.”

Source

Great American selects new specialty P&C leaders

Hoboth was the sixth employee of the fidelity/crime division when she joined Great American in 1997. She has held various leadership positions within the company, most recently serving as divisional senior vice president.

During her tenure, she oversaw most fidelity/crime underwriting offices, as well as its specialty underwriting group and IT functions. She played a key role in developing numerous initiatives within the company, including a program business model and the kidnap and ransom program. Moreover, she was instrumental in helping Great American become the largest crime writer of Native American risks in the US.

Hoboth received her Bachelor of Arts from the University of Connecticut, graduating magna cum laude. She was one of Insurance Business America’s Elite Women in Insurance for 2016.

Great American also promoted Michael B. Mulvey to divisional president of the FCIA – trade credit & political risk division. He is succeeding Phil Lally, who is set to retire in July after over three decades with the company.

Mulvey first joined FCIA in 2012 as divisional vice president, handling its claim and recovery operations. He was promoted in 2021 to divisional senior vice president and assumed responsibility for reinsurance, compliance, and corporate governance, along with serving on the division’s credit committee.

Mulvey brings more than 30 years of experience into his new role, with specific expertise in claims and underwriting. He earned a Bachelor of Arts from Lehman College and a Juris Doctor from Pace University.

Source

QBE to expand into the Netherlands

QBE to expand into the Netherlands

QBE Insurance Group is now recruiting for key posts ahead of the international insurer’s further expansion in Europe by way of a Netherlands branch.

“We have been steadily building our offering in Continental Europe, providing a credible alternative to established markets,” said Cécile Fresneau, insurance managing director at QBE Europe. “We have the financial backing of a global enterprise but retain the agility of a smaller operation.

“This enables us to offer a flexible approach and new solutions to the market and has underpinned our success so far in Europe. We see great potential in the Dutch insurance market and are excited to get started.”

According to QBE, it is hiring across underwriting, claims, operations, and finance to set up the unit. The plan is for the new branch in the Netherlands to write business incepting from January 2023. Overseeing the creation of the local team is strategy executive Sebastiaan Lambalk.

For the upcoming branch, which will have a multi-national offering, QBE initially intends to offer core commercial liability, financial lines, and property coverage for mid-market to large corporates solely through intermediaries.

Vacancies for the Dutch operations include underwriting manager, operations manager, respective heads of the various business lines, and claims manager.

The expansion is subject to regulatory approval.

Source

Four-day work week trial – what is the biggest benefit?

Four-day work week trial – what is the biggest benefit?

Almost 30% of British consumers and employers see improved work-life balance as the most important benefit of a four-day working week, according to separate surveys by GlobalData.

This comes as more than 3,300 workers across 70 companies in the UK embark on a six-month trial period of the four-day working week. This trial is larger than the one conducted in Iceland last year, which found that fewer days at work helped increase productivity and led to an improvement in workers’ wellbeing.

“The four-day working week for full-time pay is not a new concept, with trials being carried out around the world in recent years,” said Beatriz Benito, lead insurance analyst at GlobalData “However, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the changes that were already underway. The pandemic has improved awareness about health and wellbeing and changed the way businesses fundamentally operate.”

GlobalData’s 2021 UK Insurance Consumer Survey found that 29.7% of consumers see an adequate work-life balance as the most important employee benefit. The sentiment is similar among employers, with 28.9% of employer respondents of GlobalData’s 2021 UK SME Insurance Survey agreeing that work-life balance benefits are the most important benefit to provide to employees.

“The COVID-19 pandemic has shone a light on employee wellbeing, flexibility, and shifting values as individuals spent more time at home during lockdowns,” Benito said. “Now more than ever, businesses are recognizing the need for improving wellbeing support to employees.”

According to Benito, while work-life balance is important for both employees and employers, employee benefits programmes go beyond that. Since the pandemic began, insurers have revamped their products, enhancing their wellness programmes to resonate more with customers.

Source

LV= selects new chair

Moore, who will join the board as LV= chair subject to regulatory and other approvals, will take over from interim chair Seamus Creedon who will continue in his role as a non-executive director on the LV= board.

Throughout his 30-year career, Moore has amassed significant experience in the UK life insurance sector and asset management space. He served at a wide range of financial institutions including Lloyds Banking Group, Chase Manhattan Bank and Barclays Bank. He is also currently chair at PCF Group, RCI Bank UK and Cambridge & Counties Bank.

Commenting on the appointment, Creedon said he was delighted that Moore had agreed to join the board at LV=, and highlighted the incoming chair’s extensive commercial and technical knowledge of the life insurance sector and financial services. Moore has a strong track record of helping businesses thrive for all stakeholders, he said, and is “the right candidate to lead LV= into the future.”

“It has been a privilege to serve as interim chair since February,” he added, “and I very much look forward to working with Simon to ensure a smooth handover.”

Moore also commented on his appointment and said he was honoured to be taking the chair of such a distinguished British business, particularly at such an important time in LV=’s 179-year history. He noted he was attracted to the strength of the LV= brand and mutual ethos, and his focus will be on building a strong business for the benefit of its members, advisers and employees.

“As chair, I am determined that LV= will put its members at the heart of everything we do, as we drive the business forward,” he said. “LV= is a fantastic business which I am extremely proud to lead. I look forward to working with my board colleagues, and the wider LV= executive team, to forge a bright future for LV= as part of a vibrant mutual sector.”

Source

Insurance veteran among recipients of Queen’s Birthday Honours

As chair of the Dormant Assets Expansion Board, Hanson played a pivotal role in expanding the Dormant Assets Scheme to new sectors: insurance and pensions; investment and wealth management, and securities. According to RFL, the scheme’s expansion could bring a further £880 million in funding to good causes.

“We are so proud that our chair, Jane Hanson, has been awarded a CBE in the Queen’s Birthday Honours,” said RFL chief executive, Adrian Smith, OBE. “She has played an instrumental role in the success of the Dormant Assets Scheme since it was launched in 2011, resulting in £800 million of new funding to tackle social challenges such as homelessness, youth unemployment and financial exclusion. In addition, through her hard work, collaboration across government and industry, and commitment to harnessing the value of dormant assets to help address systemic challenges across the UK, she has successfully driven the expansion of the scheme to new sectors. This additional funding will transform lives and give vulnerable individuals and communities the opportunity to thrive.”

Alongside her work at RFL and DAEB, Hanson is a trustee and honorary treasurer of the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC), including the Ukraine and Afghanistan Appeals, which continue to deliver essential aid to refugees and displaced people.

“Congratulations to Jane Hanson on this well-deserved recognition of her services to the charity sector,” said Sue Inglish, chair of the board of trustees at DEC. “Over the past four years Jane has added great value to the DEC as part of the board of trustees, volunteering her time and expertise to support our work and enhance our processes. During this time the DEC has launched five appeals, including most recently the Ukraine Humanitarian Appeal which has raised over £300 million. The role of honorary treasurer is a critical one to ensure we fulfil our responsibility to all our stakeholders with efficiency and transparency. Jane continues to play an important role in the DEC board by using her years of financial experience and commitment to the charity sector to benefit those in need around the world.”

Hanson is a fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants, with over 30 years’ experience in financial services. Her current roles include chair of audit committee and non-executive director of Welsh Water plc, and audit committee chair at the Civil Aviation Authority. She previously served as non-executive director and chair of the board risk committee at Direct Line Insurance Group, Old Mutual and William Hill, as well as being risk and governance director at Aviva.

Source

Why cyber insurance is having its ‘seatbelt moment’

Paul: [00:00:12] Hello everyone and welcome to the latest edition of Insurance Business TV, A Future of Cyber Insurance Special. Yes, when it comes to cyber, your eyes, it seems, can never be focused on the present. You always have to focus on what’s ahead, because just as quickly as you may resolve one cybersecurity issue, another one emerges. The cybercriminals do not stand still. And it’s vital insurance, which is playing an increasingly crucial role in not just picking up the pieces after a cyber event, but in helping to mitigate them in the first place. Keeps pace. But who can offer us insights into the future of such a fast paced industry? Thankfully, we have someone with true cyber vision to call on. He is the head of global cyber and technology at Axis Insurance, Dan Trueman. Dan, welcome to IBTV.

Dan: [00:01:02] Thanks, Paul, and thanks for having me on. It’s really a great opportunity.

Paul: [00:01:06] Well, let’s set the scene a little bit here. Talk to us about how the cyber insurance market has developed over the last 12 months because there’s been a lot of change.

Dan: [00:01:16] I think that’s very fair. It certainly has been. It’s a it’s an endlessly dynamic market. And as you say, you know, in your intro there, there’s a good reason for that. You know, quite often what happened yesterday isn’t necessarily going to teach us what’s going to happen tomorrow. And trying to do that and react to that in a market like this creates its challenges. And certainly the last 12 months, I think the markets reacted very dynamically. And very interestingly and importantly, really, we’ve seen two, two dynamics. One, maybe the more classic insurance dynamic, prices of right have risen, you know, fundamentally because there’s been a greater understanding of some of the dynamics on the risk environment. And maybe we can unpack that a bit later. But, you know, we’ve certainly seen that price rise. But we’ve also seen, and I think really importantly, a whole new way that the market is starting to adapt, develop and look at what it sees as the minimum standards around risk. And I think that’s that’s really important. And it sort of sets a new baseline really for us going forward.

Paul: [00:02:21] And you Dan as well. You’ve labeled this a seat belt moment for the cyber insurance industry. I love the term personally. Tell us a little bit about what you mean by that.

Dan: [00:02:31] Yeah, it is something we’ve referred to that that moment, this seatbelt moment. We really believe. We think this is analogous with where historically the insurance industry has really contributed to safety in things like automobile incidents, those sort of sort of events and actually said, right, not only will we not insure all cars that don’t have seat belts in them, but we’re going to increase premiums if people aren’t willing to put them on. This is a very similar moment for what the insurance industry is doing within cyber. We are really saying, okay, it’s taken a lot of time. I say we talk about this dynamic market. I’m very fortunate enough to be in it since, you know, sort of Y2K was the thing instead of seeing the development of the cyber insurance market. And I think there’s a pernicious myth within cyber insurance that there isn’t enough data. The challenge is, I mean, there’s more than enough data we have insured so that have three and one half billion attempts to attack them a day. If you add all the sort of spray and paste sort of events that they’re going through. So it’s not about a lack of data. It’s about a lack of sort of time, energy and ability really to start processing and turning that data into information, that information into insight and that insight to action. And I think we’ve got to the point now where the market started to be able to look at action. And that’s what we call the seat belt moment. What is good look like with all we know? What could organizations do that would prevent them suffering from what are sometimes sort of very basic, very simple attacks on their their systems, their infrastructure? And can the insurance industry support organizations by saying, right, actually, I know this sounds harsh, but unless you do these three basic things and you do them well, we shouldn’t be insuring you because actually we believe that basic enough that it’s in everyone’s interest to do them. And I think that’s how we define this as a seat belt moment. Really.

Paul: [00:04:24] Yeah. And you touched on the fact that you’ve been in this market since since Y2K, as you put it. With that in mind, how well do you think the insurance industry is doing in terms of adapting to this, this current environment? And how could it improve?

Dan: [00:04:38] I think cyber insurance has a bit of a challenge. It’s got a 20 year lifespan to this point, and I think it’s adapted really fast and really well. And I think it’s sometimes it’s part of the market that puts itself under a lot of pressure to innovate, to improve. And and again, with in your introduction, you talked about how fast paced the environment is, how dynamic the bad guys can be, for want of a better phrase, and fundamentally how necessary it is for their organizations to be very dynamic and their response to to that, that process. And I think because we talk about human risk here quite often and not just sort of broader elements of the fortuitous risk spectrum, we’ve got to be very careful about how we build the right things and talk to the what are sometimes very basic organizations or sometimes organizations that have very basic knowledge about the risks they’re facing and really, frankly, need to get on with their day jobs. And how can we as an insurance industry support them in that and take away some of that risk? And I think so. Has the insurance industry adapted well to that? I think, yes, reasonably well. But by basically saying to the to our insurers at this point, we really believe you should have multifactor authentication. You know, we’ve seen it you’ve seen it pop up on those wonderful hand-held supercomputers we carry around every day, you know, our phones. And suddenly that the ubiquity of multifactor authentication, whether that’s for a transaction or to log into something, that’s part of this response. We then said, okay, if you’re going to log on remotely and we all know since you’re in this current environment, remote logging on is becoming increasingly important. You’re going to need to do that through some form of secure layer, you know, probably a VPN. And then lastly, at least if you’re going to, you need to back up your systems and you need to make sure those backups are secure and at least versions of them are held in different places, particularly offline, because what you don’t want is the bad guys not only to get into your system, but to get into your backups of your system because that makes the backups, makes them meaningless or pointless in the first place. And so looking at those, has it well, I think just identifying those three factors as has changed some of the challenges we’re facing. And I think that’s really important. How could it improve? I think as an industry, we’ve got to get better at explaining some of this technical side of things. And I you know, I probably make similar mistakes. I mean, we are talking a very technical subject at times. And breaking that down into its components that make it digestible and effective, I think is is really important. And then I think the next side of things is really how do we work better in a broader environment we work within? The cyber insurance is only one element of the challenge here. It’s really about identifying what good security. It’s like good investment and that security looks like. And how do we work within and around that broad environment to make sure this works for our clients?

Paul: [00:07:30] It makes a lot of sense and it’s very clear just from from listening to you talk as well, you know, investment in cybersecurity really has to be sort of top of mind right now. But I’d love to get some tips from you from the broker perspective, if you don’t mind. I mean, do you have any sort of strategies that you think brokers should be employing with their clients? I do.

Dan: [00:07:49] I think the brokers increasingly a I think needs to to up their education. And I think many of them are I think that that’s not an inherent criticism. But I think now is the time to make sure they’re capable of having these conversations that are reasonably technical level and asking the right person for the right information. I sometimes feel a fairly blank, nameless, faceless application form is not always the way forward. You know, this is a it’s a dynamic technical subject. So the broker needs to understand what you say yes to this. What you really mean, I think, is a useful thing to be able to ask the client. So I think that that’s really key. And I think then it’s the ability, a willingness to ask the client’s difficult questions. And to point out, I think actually what the underwriters are now needing is a greater level of transparency. And actually that greater level of transparency doesn’t always result in more expensive premiums. What it should result in is actually cheaper premiums because what underwriters are looking for is a delta or a difference in reality between good risk and not so good risk. And we want to be able to price good risk well and competitively. And I think if the the brokers are willing to to engage on that level, I think we’re going to end up with a market that is much better at transferring this risk, that is much more appropriately priced and is actually a level that everyone knows is sustainable, not just in the short term, but for the longer term as well.

Paul: [00:09:12] And I want to ask you as well Dan and I’m very conscious of hyperbole here, but do you think insurance perhaps as a as a larger role to play a societal role of sorts, if you want, in terms of kind of growing awareness of these risks and helping to mitigate them.

Dan: [00:09:27] I think it’s a really fair question and equally hyperbole or sort of forgive me, the polemic that we get into, but I genuinely believe and agree that I think there’s a social value in insurance full stop. And I certainly remember as a in my early my underwriting journey, you know, opening the paper and realizing that almost every single angle, every single news story had an insurance angle or insurance element to it. And I think we’ve all been through that particular journey. So I think, sure, insurance full stop has an important societal role to play. And I think in this element it really does. We are at this point where we are seeing enough data and we are thus having enough information. We have more insight than we’ve ever had before. How can we share that more effectively with organizations, whether they want to buy cyber insurance or they just want to transfer their risk better or understand their risk better or accept and retain that risk? I don’t think I think all of these things are relevant. I think the important thing is we are willing to share that what we think good looks like. And I think at this point we’ve got enough that we should be doing that. And as an industry we should be louder about that concept. And I think now’s the time.

Paul: [00:10:39] Just described how I how I try to entice any new journalists to join us. In fact, every news story does have an insurance angle. I agree with you 100%. But I’m going to throw one last question at you, if you don’t mind. And I’m going to keep it very, very simple here. Where does the cyber insurance market go next?

Dan: [00:10:59] I think the market has gone through a really interesting point here. So the reason rates changed in the last year due to sort of two fundamental factors. One, we’ve seen over the last few years an increase in frequency and severity within particularly the ransomware element of the loss we’re doing. We as insurers can probably deal with one of those at once. And that’s you know, that’s the game we’re in. But both is a challenge. When you see both frequency and severity change, then we need a shift in the pricing curve and a shift in the approach. And that’s where where we’ve come from and that’s what we’ve had. So I think that’s really important. On the second side, though, we also increasingly understanding the systemic exposure within the cyber insurance market. Aggregation management is Insurance 101, and we’ve always been very effective at looking at it, but not very effective at really understanding what that’s going to be and the impact that can have. And so that’s obviously an element of price as well. And I think what we’re going to need to do is maybe look at how do we approach that systemic risk better, both understanding it, getting better information at it, and potentially this is my sort of, you know, the sort of 1000 question answer is, I do think I wonder whether the cyber insurance market will bifurcate at some point and have a sort of catastrophic element, systemic risk only, and then sort of attritional risk only in the future. And I think it’s going to be an interesting moment for the market and I can see it coming.

Paul: [00:12:27] Yeah. You’re leaving us with plenty of food for thought there. Dan, great to have you with us. And huge thanks to Axis Insurance. Clearly, the cyber insurance market is going to keep evolving. So I’m sure we’ll have you back with us soon. And of course, for the latest, not just on cyber insurance, but on the entire insurance marketplace. And make sure you keep your focus here on Insurance Business TV. 

Source

Verisk reveals new president of claims solutions

Verisk reveals new president of claims solutions

Insurance analytics provider Verisk has announced the appointment of Maroun Mourad (pictured above) as president of claims solutions upon the retirement of Rich Della Rocca, effective July 1, 2022.

“We have a deep and talented bench of executives at Verisk, and Maroun was selected from a strong group of diverse internal candidates,” said Mark Anquillare, president and chief operating officer of Verisk. “Maroun’s entrepreneurial spirit and customer-centricity will undoubtedly prove valuable in revolutionising the claims function in support of our customers and for the benefit of the industry.”

Mourad joined the company in 2015 as senior vice president of commercial lines. He advanced to president of ISO commercial lines in 2017 and president of global underwriting in 2020. When Verisk established its new Life & Growth Markets division in underwriting, Mourad was selected as its president.

“I couldn’t be more excited to lead our claims organisation into the future, building on a rock-solid foundation across our teams, businesses and geographies,” Mourad said. “The claims function is the ultimate customer-facing unit for any insurer. I look forward to exploring further ways to support our customers. One way we’ll do this is by increasing our focus on holistic solutions across process automation, technology and analytics to support this most important function.”

Della Rocca (pictured below) is retiring after 27 years at Verisk, having served the past two years as president of claims.

“Rich helped to build an integrated and increasingly global claims business with solutions for claims fraud detection, property estimating, auto and casualty solutions – with proprietary data and innovative technologies as the foundation,” Anquillare said. “We are grateful for his many contributions and leadership over the years, and we wish him all the best in this next exciting chapter of his life.”

Source

Aviva partners with Signlive to provide sign language interpretation

Aviva partners with Signlive to provide sign language interpretation

Aviva has partnered with interpreting service SignLive to give customers the ability to communicate using British Sign Language (BSL) when calling the company.

Free of charge to customers, the service will enable Aviva’s home and motor insurance customers to connect via video with a certified BSL interpreter, who can provide two-way translation and facilitate a real-time conversation with an Aviva representative, the insurer said.

BSL users who have never used SignLive will need to complete a short one-time registration process. They will then be able to find Aviva in the community directory and simply press “call” to connect. Initially, claims and customer service queries will be available, and Aviva said it plans to offer other services soon.

“We’re committed to making our services as accessible as possible, and it’s vital that our customers can communicate with us in a way that’s right for them,” said Charlotte Moran, Aviva’s director of customer operations. “We’re delighted and proud to be partnering with SignLive on this scheme and look forward to working with them to make it even easier for our deaf customers to receive the support they need.”

According to the British Deaf Association, BSL is used by around 151,000 individuals in the UK and is the preferred language of 87,000 deaf people. It is set to receive legal recognition in England, Wales and Scotland, when the recently passed BSL Bill receives Royal Assent later this year.

“We’re so pleased to be working with Aviva and commend their push to become more accessible to customers,” said Joel Kellhofer, CEO of SignLive. “This partnership will make the home and motor insurance process so much easier for deaf customers, giving them a way to communicate with Aviva in their first language.”

Source

contact us